The link below is to an article that looks at an app that blends the ebook and audiobook reading/listening experience.
For more visit:
http://goodereader.com/blog/e-book-news/findaway-launches-new-e-book-and-audiobook-app-called-duobook
The link below is to an article that looks at an app that blends the ebook and audiobook reading/listening experience.
For more visit:
http://goodereader.com/blog/e-book-news/findaway-launches-new-e-book-and-audiobook-app-called-duobook
The link below is to an article that reports on readers living longer.
For more visit:
http://goodereader.com/blog/e-book-news/people-who-read-books-live-longer
The link below is to an article that takes a look at Sweek, a free writing and reading app.
For more visit:
http://www.noshelfrequired.com/free-mobile-reading-and-writing-platform-for-all-to-use-yes-please-and-thank-you-sweek/
Kevin Wheldall, Macquarie University
Children who do not learn to read in the first few years of schooling are typically destined to a school career of educational failure, because reading underpins almost all subsequent learning.
Even when exemplary reading instruction is available, there will always be some children who take longer than others to catch on to what reading is all about. It is important to identify these low-progress readers as early as possible so that they do not fall too far behind their peers.
We need a clear plan in place to ensure that no child falls through the net. Such a plan needs to be both effective and cost-effective.
A three tier model of reading instruction, known as Response to Intervention (or RtI) has become known in recent years as the best way of achieving this.
The three tier RtI model is based on the first tier of exemplary, quality initial instruction in reading for all students during their first year of schooling.
The instruction offered to all children beginning school should be based on what internationally conducted scientific research has shown to be most effective.
To the layman, this sounds patently obvious but this is not what is currently the case in many Australian schools. For the last few decades an implicit model of reading instruction has held sway.
Most of this implicit approach to reading instruction makes a good bedrock to build effective reading instruction on. But it is not enough for every child to learn to read.
The majority of children will need direct, explicit and systematic instruction in the five pillars or “five big ideas” of reading instruction: phonological awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension.
What is often lacking in initial reading instruction, in particular, is effective instruction in what is known as synthetic phonics: specific instruction in how to relate letters to sounds and to blend letter sounds into words.
In New South Wales and some other states, many schools typically screen students at the beginning of year one for possible placement in Reading Recovery, one of the most well known and most widely utilised remedial reading program in the world.
Whatever the debate about the efficacy of Reading Recovery, it is necessarily very expensive. It is based on a daily, half hour, one-to-one session with a highly trained Reading Recovery teacher, for two or more terms.
The RtI model recommends that struggling readers should be offered more intensive Tier 2 intervention in small groups of three to four students.
Again the instruction provided to these students is based on what the scientific research evidence has shown to be most effective.
In effect, this is essentially the same emphasis on the same five big ideas of reading instruction but it is both more intensive and more individualised. Teachers also need to be more responsive to the specific idiosyncratic needs of the students with whom they are working.
Research suggests that good small group instruction can be just as effective as one-to-one instruction.
However, even with a solid Tier 2 small group reading intervention in place for young low-progress readers, there will still be a very small number of students who “fail to thrive”, perhaps about 3 to 5 per cent of the total population of Year 1 students.
The small number of students whose reading problems seem to be more entrenched and who are resistant even to specialised intensive small group instruction are the ones who should receive Tier 3 one-to-one intensive reading instruction.
By now it will come as no surprise that the general nature of the instruction provided in a one-to-one Tier 3 intervention is exactly the same as offered at Tier 1 and Tier 2.
What is different is the intensity of instruction provided to this very small minority of students.
Because we have successfully taught the vast majority of Year 1 students the basics of learning to read by Tier 1 and where necessary, Tier 2 teaching, we can afford to provide these remaining students with the individual support they need.
Some of these students may need this support for some time, but this is a far more manageable proposition with a smaller number of students.
With this three tier Response to Intervention model in place, most, if not all, children will learn to read, given the necessary time and resources.
The RtI model does not stop at the end of Year 1. It’s important to monitor all students’ reading progress closely, especially for the first three years of schooling.
By following these models, it’s not too much to ask to expect all of our children to learn to read.
![]()
Kevin Wheldall, Emeritus Professor of Education, Macquarie University
This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
The link below is to an article that takes a look at boys and the way they read.
For more visit:
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/oct/22/the-truth-about-boys-and-books-they-read-less-and-skip-pages
Cain Polidano, University of Melbourne and Chris Ryan, University of Melbourne
Teenagers with low reading levels, who went on to further education, don’t find it any harder to get a job at the age of 25, research shows.
At age 25, young Australians whose reading proficiency at age 15 was ranked low in the international literacy and numeracy test were employed at the same rates as those with higher levels of achievement.
For both the low (below level 3) and medium (level 3 and 4) reading proficiency groups, 58% were employed full-time, with a further 13-14% employed part-time.
Low proficiency levels in the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) tests are deemed to be those at a level insufficient for students to perform the moderate reading tasks that are needed to meet real-life challenges and are below minimum Australian standards.
Around one-third of Australian 15 year olds had low reading proficiency levels, with just over one half were in the medium proficiency group.
The study also found that low school achievers work in jobs that have similar expected lifetime earnings as the medium reading proficiency group.
The results are particularly surprising because it is well known from other research that poor reading skills in adulthood are associated with poorer employment prospects and work in low-paid jobs.
It seems that not every teenager with low reading proficiency necessarily becomes an adult with poor reading skills.
These results can be explained by high rates of participation in, and good outcomes from, Vocational Education and Training (VET) by those with low reading proficiency.
Around 58% undertook VET study, 15% higher education study and 14% both.
In contrast, those from the medium group focused more on higher education — 42% higher education, 36% VET and 15% both.
Those from the low proficiency group compensate for studying below bachelor-level VET qualifications by choosing courses that have good labour market prospects.
Compared to the medium group which did not complete a university degree, the low group chose initial VET courses that had 6% higher graduate earnings.
It is thought that those with low reading proficiency at age 15 explore VET options from an early age.
Given the large number of VET courses available – and the fact that most are designed to prepare students for specific occupations – early career exploration may mean the low proficiency group is better prepared to make course choices.
Australia is one of only a handful of countries with the capacity to track outcomes of PISA participants through its Longitudinal Survey of Australian Youth (LSAY).
In comparing outcomes, we also controlled for a range of differences between the student groups that may confound the analysis, such as family socioeconomic and demographic background and grade level at age 15.
The results rely on the survey respondents at age 25 being representative of those first surveyed at age 15, which can be problematic if attrition rates are high, as they are here at around 75%.
In the paper, we report a number of supplementary analyses that indicate that the results are unlikely to be affected by non-random attrition. The results also do not appear to reflect particularly high levels of motivation or ambition among the low skill group members who remain in the survey.
Further education and training plays a role in up-grading the skills of individuals.
A study of a Canadian PISA cohort reported that when respondents were re-tested at age 24, the reading levels among those who had undertaken post-school studies had increased from their age 15 levels.
The findings in our research underlines the role that VET plays in providing opportunities for low-achieving school students to engage further in study and participate fully in a modern economy.
It also demonstrates the importance of course choice in shaping outcomes.
For schools and education departments, the message is to not only ensure access to VET, but also to support young people in making good course choices. Early career counselling is a step in this direction.
We stress that these results do not mean that academic achievement is unimportant. On the contrary, we find more marked differences in labour market outcomes at 25 between those with high reading proficiency (levels 5 and above), suggesting substantial returns to achievement among the most skilled.
![]()
Cain Polidano, Research Fellow, University of Melbourne and Chris Ryan, Director, Economics of Education and Child Development, University of Melbourne
This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.
The link below is to an article that takes a look at the problem of reading too many books at once.
For more visit:
http://www.readitforward.com/article/the-trouble-with-reading-multiple-books-at-once/
You must be logged in to post a comment.